From: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-next list <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: dborkman@redhat.com, brouer@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next] packet: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:10:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386828604.2584.13.camel@ThinkPad-T5421> (raw)
This patches tries to fix the following warning on next-1211 by
replacing smp_processor_id() with raw_smp_processor_id().
Also, it seems that we could move skb_set_queue_mapping() into
packet_pick_tx_queue(), so we avoid calling it one more time
unnecessarily if we are going into the normal dev_queue_xmit() code
path.
[ 11.120893] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: arping/3510
[ 11.120913] caller is .packet_sendmsg+0xc14/0xe68
[ 11.120920] CPU: 13 PID: 3510 Comm: arping Not tainted 3.13.0-rc3-next-20131211-dirty #1
[ 11.120926] Call Trace:
[ 11.120932] [c0000001f803f6f0] [c0000000000138dc] .show_stack+0x110/0x25c (unreliable)
[ 11.120942] [c0000001f803f7e0] [c00000000083dd24] .dump_stack+0xa0/0x37c
[ 11.120951] [c0000001f803f870] [c000000000493fd4] .debug_smp_processor_id+0xfc/0x12c
[ 11.120959] [c0000001f803f900] [c0000000007eba78] .packet_sendmsg+0xc14/0xe68
[ 11.120968] [c0000001f803fa80] [c000000000700968] .sock_sendmsg+0xa0/0xe0
[ 11.120975] [c0000001f803fbf0] [c0000000007014d8] .SyS_sendto+0x100/0x148
[ 11.120983] [c0000001f803fd60] [c0000000006fff10] .SyS_socketcall+0x1c4/0x2e8
[ 11.120990] [c0000001f803fe30] [c00000000000a1e4] syscall_exit+0x0/0x9c
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index 9d70f13..20f6d56 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -237,6 +237,13 @@ struct packet_skb_cb {
static void __fanout_unlink(struct sock *sk, struct packet_sock *po);
static void __fanout_link(struct sock *sk, struct packet_sock *po);
+static u16 packet_pick_tx_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ u16 queue_index = (u16)raw_smp_processor_id() % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
+ skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, queue_index);
+ return queue_index;
+}
+
static int packet_direct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
@@ -259,7 +266,7 @@ static int packet_direct_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
return NET_XMIT_DROP;
}
- queue_map = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
+ queue_map = packet_pick_tx_queue(dev, skb);
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, queue_map);
__netif_tx_lock_bh(txq);
@@ -308,11 +315,6 @@ static bool packet_use_direct_xmit(const struct packet_sock *po)
return po->xmit == packet_direct_xmit;
}
-static u16 packet_pick_tx_queue(struct net_device *dev)
-{
- return (u16) smp_processor_id() % dev->real_num_tx_queues;
-}
-
/* register_prot_hook must be invoked with the po->bind_lock held,
* or from a context in which asynchronous accesses to the packet
* socket is not possible (packet_create()).
@@ -2219,7 +2221,6 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
}
}
- skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, packet_pick_tx_queue(dev));
skb->destructor = tpacket_destruct_skb;
__packet_set_status(po, ph, TP_STATUS_SENDING);
atomic_inc(&po->tx_ring.pending);
@@ -2429,7 +2430,6 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
skb->dev = dev;
skb->priority = sk->sk_priority;
skb->mark = sk->sk_mark;
- skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, packet_pick_tx_queue(dev));
if (po->has_vnet_hdr) {
if (vnet_hdr.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) {
next reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 6:10 Li Zhong [this message]
2013-12-11 9:55 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] packet: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code Daniel Borkmann
2013-12-12 23:55 ` Li Zhong
2013-12-12 7:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-12-13 6:41 ` Li Zhong
2013-12-13 7:40 ` Li Zhong
2013-12-11 21:49 ` David Miller
2013-12-12 22:54 ` Li Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386828604.2584.13.camel@ThinkPad-T5421 \
--to=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox