From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Paris Subject: Re: linux-next: New build failures in Sep 25 tree Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:08:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1411744121.3402.28.camel@localhost> References: <20140925202559.GA1750@roeck-us.net> <20140926075859.GA21697@chokladfabriken.org> <54256AF1.6030800@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <54256AF1.6030800@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Stefan Kristiansson , Geert Uytterhoeven , Stephen Rothwell , Ulf Hansson , Vineet Gupta , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-Next , linux , rgb@redhat.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 06:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/26/2014 12:59 AM, Stefan Kristiansson wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 08:30:57AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Hi G=C3=BCnther, > >> > >> [cc openrisc] > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>> New build failures: > >> > >>> openrisc-defconfig > >>> > >>> In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c:31:0: > >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h: In function 'syscall_get_a= rch': > >>> ./arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h:77:9: error: 'EM_OPENRISC' = undeclared > >> > >> That's not a new one. It's been failing for half or year or so. > >> > >> If you only see it now, that means something else got fixed ;-) > >> > > > >>From what I can see, it's caused by > > ce5d112827e5 ("ARCH: AUDIT: implement syscall_get_arch for all arch= es") > > that got (re?)introduced two days ago. > > > > To me it seems that the problem is that EM_OPENRISC is > > missing in include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h, but if that's the case, > > I think microblaze have the same problem with that patch applied. > > >=20 > Microblaze builds for some reason. But, yes, that commit is from Marc= h. > Maybe that is where I remember it from. >=20 > You are right, it builds if I add the define. I'll submit a patch to = fix > the problem if the resulting image builds. >=20 > Guenter I had no idea you were having build problems for so long!! I'm so sorry! The tree got pulled from -next for a while because we ran into some arm problems and I was going on vacation. So I pulled from -next. It just went back into -next (after I dealt with arm). And so you saw build failure again on the 25th. I guess the choices are moving EM_OPENRISC public like the other ones (which I believe you sent a patch for) or maybe you can include arch/openrisc/include/uapi/asm/elf.h inside arch/openrisc/include/asm/syscall.h so you still get to keep that definition 'private'. I have no idea if such an include would give you a circular mess. That happens all to often at the arch level.