From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:26:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423063563.2090.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150204172925.728016bf@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:29 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'sdev_prefix_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:119:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> ret = dev_printk(level, &sdev->sdev_gendev, "%s", logbuf);
> ^
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'scmd_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:146:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
> ret = dev_printk(level, &scmd->device->sdev_gendev, "%s", logbuf);
> ^
>
> Caused by commit ded85c193a39 ("scsi: Implement per-cpu logging
> buffer") interacting with commit d1f1052c5204 ("device: Change
> dev_<level> logging functions to return void") from the driver-core
> tree.
>
> I added the following merge resolution patch. Someone will have to
> remember to tell Linus. Also, the void return may be able to be
> propagated further up the chain since these two new affected functions
> now always return 0.
Hannes posted a more correct fix for it today to the scsi list.
However, sorting this out isn't just about the short term fix: We can't
afford the bisection failure of SCSI not building over a wide range of
commits, so our tree will need to be pulled ahead of the driver-core
tree.
I've got to say, while it's great that linux-next spotted this ahead of
time (saves us all a massive beating from Linus, thanks Stephen) it's
unfortunate to have this type of thing turn up on the edge of a merge
window, especially caused by a trivial commit which perhaps shouldn't
have gone in so late.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 6:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-04 6:47 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-04 15:26 ` James Bottomley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-20 0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28 8:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-06 5:04 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13 0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13 16:18 ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-23 0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-23 0:56 ` James Bottomley
[not found] ` <20161224123853.08284e8a@canb.auug.org.au>
2016-12-24 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-12-24 10:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-24 11:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-24 16:48 ` James Bottomley
2015-11-13 1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-13 8:32 ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-06-02 8:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-02 15:02 ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-10 6:27 ` Anish Bhatt
2014-11-10 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 15:21 ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 16:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-04 4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-04 7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-05 4:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03 2:52 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03 7:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-03 18:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26 8:34 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-26 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26 9:57 ` James Bottomley
2014-09-26 12:43 ` Brian King
2013-01-12 2:23 wenxiong
2013-01-11 1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-11 7:34 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 15:27 ` Brian King
2013-01-11 15:37 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 16:05 ` Greg KH
2013-01-11 17:35 ` Brian King
2013-01-11 18:04 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-20 0:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-20 8:50 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-26 1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-26 7:57 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-26 14:07 ` Greg KH
2012-03-27 7:29 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-27 22:17 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-27 22:22 ` Greg KH
2012-03-27 22:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-27 22:39 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-28 23:54 ` Greg KH
2012-03-29 19:38 ` Greg KH
2012-03-28 23:52 ` Greg KH
2012-03-29 7:32 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-29 8:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-29 8:35 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-29 9:03 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-29 16:15 ` Greg KH
2012-03-23 2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-23 4:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-23 8:14 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23 8:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-23 9:01 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23 15:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-23 10:26 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-23 15:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-23 8:20 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23 9:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-15 1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-15 6:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-29 2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 7:17 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-29 8:07 ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-05-27 3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-27 13:47 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-26 0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-26 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-10 1:33 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-10 22:16 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-10 23:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-16 0:38 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1423063563.2090.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).