linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:26:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423063563.2090.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150204172925.728016bf@canb.auug.org.au>

On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 17:29 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'sdev_prefix_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:119:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
>   ret = dev_printk(level, &sdev->sdev_gendev, "%s", logbuf);
>       ^
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c: In function 'scmd_printk':
> drivers/scsi/scsi_logging.c:146:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
>   ret = dev_printk(level, &scmd->device->sdev_gendev, "%s", logbuf);
>       ^
> 
> Caused by commit ded85c193a39 ("scsi: Implement per-cpu logging
> buffer") interacting with commit d1f1052c5204 ("device: Change
> dev_<level> logging functions to return void") from the driver-core
> tree.
> 
> I added the following merge resolution patch.  Someone will have to
> remember to tell Linus.  Also, the void return may be able to be
> propagated further up the chain since these two new affected functions
> now always return 0.

Hannes posted a more correct fix for it today to the scsi list.
However, sorting this out isn't just about the short term fix:  We can't
afford the bisection failure of SCSI not building over a wide range of
commits, so our tree will need to be pulled ahead of the driver-core
tree.

I've got to say, while it's great that linux-next spotted this ahead of
time (saves us all a massive beating from Linus, thanks Stephen) it's
unfortunate to have this type of thing turn up on the edge of a merge
window, especially caused by a trivial commit which perhaps shouldn't
have gone in so late.

James

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-04  6:29 linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-04  6:47 ` Joe Perches
2015-02-04 15:26 ` James Bottomley [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-20  0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28  8:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-06  5:04 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13  0:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-13 16:18   ` Jens Axboe
2016-12-23  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-23  0:56 ` James Bottomley
     [not found]   ` <20161224123853.08284e8a@canb.auug.org.au>
2016-12-24 10:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-12-24 10:44       ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-24 11:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-24 16:48       ` James Bottomley
2015-11-13  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-13  8:32 ` Sreekanth Reddy
2015-06-02  8:06 Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-02 15:02 ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10  6:15 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-10  6:27 ` Anish Bhatt
2014-11-10 13:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 15:21     ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 15:48       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-10 15:50         ` James Bottomley
2014-11-10 16:01           ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-11-04  4:43 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-04  7:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-05  4:48   ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03  2:52 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03  7:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-11-03 18:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26  8:34 Stephen Rothwell
2014-09-26  8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-09-26  9:57   ` James Bottomley
2014-09-26 12:43     ` Brian King
2013-01-12  2:23 wenxiong
2013-01-11  1:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-11  7:34 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 15:27   ` Brian King
2013-01-11 15:37     ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 16:05       ` Greg KH
2013-01-11 17:35         ` Brian King
2013-01-11 18:04           ` James Bottomley
2012-07-20  0:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-20  8:50 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-26  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-26  7:57 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-26 14:07   ` Greg KH
2012-03-27  7:29     ` James Bottomley
2012-03-27 22:17     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-27 22:22       ` Greg KH
2012-03-27 22:35         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-27 22:39           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-28 23:54             ` Greg KH
2012-03-29 19:38             ` Greg KH
2012-03-28 23:52           ` Greg KH
2012-03-29  7:32             ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-29  8:25               ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-29  8:35                 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-29  9:03                 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-29 16:15                   ` Greg KH
2012-03-23  2:00 Stephen Rothwell
2012-03-23  4:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-23  8:14   ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23  8:53     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-03-23  9:01       ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23 15:22         ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-23 10:26   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2012-03-23 15:30     ` Jeff Garzik
2012-03-23  8:20 ` James Bottomley
2012-03-23  9:24   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-15  1:58 Stephen Rothwell
2011-12-15  6:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-29  2:09 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29  7:17 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-29  8:07   ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-05-27  3:25 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-27 13:47 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-26  0:19 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-26 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-10  1:33 Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-10 22:16 ` James Bottomley
2010-02-10 23:11   ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-16  0:38   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1423063563.2090.2.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).