From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of most of the trees Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:51:15 -0700 Message-ID: <1432839075.1556.4.camel@perches.com> References: <20150528220607.67a68696@canb.auug.org.au> <20150528.114203.717794268051352731.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150528.114203.717794268051352731.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 11:42 -0700, David Miller wrote: > I've applied the following to net-next, thanks for your report. > > ==================== > [PATCH] treewide: Add missing vmalloc.h inclusion. > > All of these files were only building on non-x86 because of > the indirect of inclusion of vmalloc.h by, of all things, > "net/inet_hashtables.h" [] > diff --git a/crypto/algif_skcipher.c b/crypto/algif_skcipher.c [] > @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static int skcipher_recvmsg(struct kiocb *unused, struct socket *sock, > err = skcipher_wait_for_data(sk, flags); > if (err) > goto unlock; > + used = ctx->used; huh?