From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [next-20170217] WARN @/arch/powerpc/include/asm/xics.h:124 .icp_hv_eoi+0x40/0x140
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:18:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487629094.23576.183.camel@au1.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702201402270.4208@nanos>
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 14:04 -0800, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > HOWEVER. Looking at current upstream code I don't understand the error,
> > the DEBUG_SHIRQ code is calling the driver's handler not the flow
> > handler so it shouldn't be called handle_fasteoi_irq or am I missing
> > something ?
>
> I tried to invoke the normal handler path which also invokes the flow
> handler, but that breaks on x86 as well for different reasons. I zapped
> that commit and still need to find a way to do that debug thing proper. So
> it's appearence in -next was only temporary.
Ok I see. Yes I wouldn't be surprised if we aren't the only ones to
expect that one get_irq() matches *one* invocation of the flow handler.
We had to hack around this for irq_replay already but at least we have
a hook to do that.
You could possibly use replay, but what's wrong with what the code
currently does which is to just call the driver handler directly ?
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-19 15:09 [next-20170217] WARN @/arch/powerpc/include/asm/xics.h:124 .icp_hv_eoi+0x40/0x140 Sachin Sant
2017-02-20 2:35 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-02-20 5:04 ` Sachin Sant
2017-02-20 10:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-02-20 20:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-02-20 22:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-20 22:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2017-02-20 3:44 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487629094.23576.183.camel@au1.ibm.com \
--to=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox