From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the uuid tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 21:17:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497982654.22624.172.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25d08c14-eea7-8b58-675a-1124200b50a6@codeaurora.org>
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 12:13 -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 6/20/2017 2:47 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 10:43 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> Andy,
>
> The patch that was causing compilation failures on your branch was:
>
> 22e31da efi: Switch to use new generic UUID API
>
> The failures were because of the removed guid_t * casts. Note that
> this
> patch will conflict with my patch series, so you may want to rebase
> it
> onto linux-next once they are in.
Thanks for pointing out.
That branch is WIP, it's okay it fails to compile.
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 5:21 linux-next: manual merge of the uuid tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-16 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-19 0:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-19 9:19 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-19 10:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-19 10:22 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-19 18:41 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-06-19 19:22 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-06-20 8:40 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-20 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-20 8:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-20 18:13 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-06-20 18:17 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-06-20 18:20 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-20 18:26 ` Baicar, Tyler
2017-06-21 9:21 ` Will Deacon
2017-06-21 18:19 ` Baicar, Tyler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1497982654.22624.172.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).