From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the scsi tree
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 09:32:47 -0700
Message-ID: <1502296367.3602.26.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
References: <20170809092730.1138bf7e@canb.auug.org.au>
         <1502235696.2736.120.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <yq14ltg676h.fsf@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <yq14ltg676h.fsf@oracle.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:24 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> James,
> 
> > 
> > Yes we had to drop a commit which proved problematic in the fixes
> > tree.
> 
> I'm still not sure why you decided to rebase instead of waiting for
> me to drop the patch. That's how we usually do it...

We can certainly do it that way around.  If you want to rebase to drop
the patch, I can set the top of the fixes tree to your rebase. 

James