From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xarray tree with the wireless-drivers-next tree Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:56:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1530176199.4988.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20180628145900.4ca1e648@canb.auug.org.au> <1530172269.4988.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20180628084612.GB7646@bombadil.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180628084612.GB7646@bombadil.infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Kalle Valo , Wireless , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 01:46 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:51:09AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 14:59 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the xarray tree got a conflict in: > > > > > > lib/Kconfig.debug > > > > > > between commit: > > > > > > 0e2dc70e3d0d ("bitfield: add tests") > > > > > > from the wireless-drivers-next tree and commit: > > > > > > d968f529e39f ("xarray: Add XArray load operation") > > > > > > from the xarray tree. > > > > Thanks for the heads-up! Not really sure where/how we'll be able to get > > that resolved before it hits Linus, but as the conflict seems rather > > easy (overlapping additions), I guess it's not such a big deal. > > I don't care which order the tests are presented in. I'll happily move the > XArray addition to a different location in the file. Good point, that works. Thanks! johannes