From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: usb/sparc build failure Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 09:50:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20080527165019.GB3699@kroah.com> References: <20080527202630.6352736d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38498 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757505AbYE0QwL (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2008 12:52:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080527202630.6352736d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, David Vrabel , "David S. Miller" On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:26:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Today's (though it is not new) linux-next build (spac allmodconfig) fails > like this: > > drivers/uwb/whci.c:166: error: `DMA_64BIT_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) > drivers/uwb/whci.c:166: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > drivers/uwb/whci.c:166: error: for each function it appears in.) > drivers/uwb/whci.c:168: error: `DMA_32BIT_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function) Is this sparc64 or sparc32? I don't seem to get these errors using the sparc64 cross compiler tool chain. thanks, greg k-h