From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:29:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20080606002957.6329a0ec.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080605175217.cee497f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080605195604.41623687.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606071707.GB9708@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:57024 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753794AbYFFHaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 03:30:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080606071707.GB9708@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:17:07 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:52:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git > > > > Instantly oopses on two x86_64 boxes with this config: > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt > > > > oops: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/p6056454.jpg > > > > At a guess I'd say the sched_domains code is calling into slab before > > slab is initalised. Something like that. > > did SLUB change in linux-next? There no such problem in -tip. It crashes on two quite different machines with both slab and slub.