From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 01:01:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20080606010149.4d757b92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080605175217.cee497f3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080605195604.41623687.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606071707.GB9708@elte.hu> <20080606072536.GA19334@elte.hu> <20080606003327.9ac0e91b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606074137.GA28962@elte.hu> <20080606004743.a78180c3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080606175358.a439d1bb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:60236 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755472AbYFFICj (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:02:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080606175358.a439d1bb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , the arch/x86 maintainers On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 17:53:58 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 00:47:43 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > My third bisect iteration has hit this: > > > > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c: In function 'get_kmmio_probe': > > arch/x86/mm/kmmio.c:85: error: implicit declaration of function 'list_for_each_entry_rcu' > > You need the following patch from linux-next. Which should be the commit > immediately after the merge of the ftrace tree. Well yes - I just bodged it by hand then unbodged it later. But we have a bisection break there. Admittedly a minor one, unless the bug you're bisecting for requires that kprobes be configured. But it would be nice to squish it. I hope Ingo isn't following this once-you've-checked-it-in-you-can't-fix-it stupidity :(