Re: linux-next: Tree for June 5

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > Subject: [PATCH] sched: don't call node_to_cpumask() on nodes > 
> > nr_node_ids
> 
> AFAICS this is not yet required for v2.6.26, as the requirement to 
> never iterate to MAX_NUMNODES and call nr_cpus_node() with the index 
> only got introduced by Mike's patch.

the one below is needed as well i think.

	Ingo
---
 kernel/sched.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: tip/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ tip/kernel/sched.c
@@ -6576,9 +6576,9 @@ static int find_next_best_node(int node,
 
 	min_val = INT_MAX;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_node_ids; i++) {
 		/* Start at @node */
-		n = (node + i) % MAX_NUMNODES;
+		n = (node + i) % nr_node_ids;
 
 		if (!nr_cpus_node(n))
 			continue;