From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: block merge conflicts
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:56:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080611195604.GE20851@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080611184729.978d62d2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Jun 11 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> [You win the prize for most conflicts in one day! :-)]
Don't know whether to laugh or cry ;-)
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in the following
> files:
>
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig against the ftrace tree (trivial)
> arch/s390/kernel/time.c against the s390 tree (function name change
> etr_sync_cpu_start -> clock_sync_cpu_start and
> etr_disable_sync_clock -> disable_sync_clock)
> arch/x86/kernel/apic_32.c against the x86 tree (set_intr_gate ->
> alloc_intr_gate)
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c against the x86 tree (trivial)
> arch/x86/kernel/i8259_64.c against the x86 tree (set_intr_gate ->
> alloc_intr_gate and the part of the file was
> moved to irqinit_64.c)
> arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c against the x86 tree (argument to smp_call_function
> changed)
> arch/x86/kernel/nmi_32.c against the x86 tree (file was merged
> into nmi.c which merged correctly)
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c against the kvm tree (trivial context and an
> on_each_cpu was removed)
> arch/x86/xen/smp.c against the cpus4096 tree (for_each_cpu_mask ->
> for_each_cpu_mask_nr and context)
> include/asm-x86/hw_irq_32.h against the x86 tree (merged into hw_irq.h)
> include/asm-x86/hw_irq_64.h against the x86 tree (merged into hw_irq.h
> and irq_vectors.h)
> include/asm-x86/mach-default/irq_vectors.h against the x86 tree (merged
> into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h)
> include/asm-x86/mach-voyager/irq_vectors.h against the x86 tree (merged
> into asm-x86/irq_vectors.h)
> (There was a bug in the above file - QIC_CALL_FUNCTION_CPI is used twice
> instead of being QIC_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_CPI the second time)
> kernel/Makefile against the sched tree (trivial context)
> kernel/rcupdate.c against the sched tree (changed parameter to
> on_each_cpu)
> net/iucv/iucv.c against the net tree (trivial context)
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c against the kvm tree (trivial context)
>
>
> So you can see that there are some challenges there. I tried to fix it
> all up as well as I could but no guarantees.
>
> However the powerpc ppc64_defconfig build failed immediately like this:
>
> In file included from include/linux/smp.h:29,
> from include/linux/topology.h:33,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:683,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:4,
> from include/linux/slab.h:12,
> from include/linux/percpu.h:5,
> from include2/asm/time.h:18,
> from include2/asm/cputime.h:26,
> from include/linux/sched.h:66,
> from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:17:
> include2/asm/smp.h: In function 'arch_send_call_function_single_ipi':
> include2/asm/smp.h:121: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> include2/asm/smp.h: In function 'arch_send_call_function_ipi':
> include2/asm/smp.h:129: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>
> and it went downhill from there - smp_opts_t is defined in asm/machdep.h
> but including that in asm/smp.h only gets us more errors.
>
> So I have reverted the block tree for today, sorry.
No worries, I'll make sure to compile test everything again and send you
a note. I had half-expected the move of the arch defines from
linux/smp.h to asm/smp.h to cause a problem or two, I'll double check
everything.
I'll send you a note tomorrow when things are going.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-11 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-11 8:47 linux-next: block merge conflicts Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-11 19:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-06-12 1:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-12 13:26 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-12 13:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-13 7:22 ` linux-next: manual merge of block tree Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-13 7:48 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080611195604.GE20851@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).