From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: gfs2 tree build failure Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:12:25 +1000 Message-ID: <20080627151225.1fe44918.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__27_Jun_2008_15_12_25_+1000_6wgWLMJCvBXTE42N" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:57735 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751097AbYF0FNK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:13:10 -0400 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Steven Whitehouse Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Fri__27_Jun_2008_15_12_25_+1000_6wgWLMJCvBXTE42N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Steven, Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: ERROR: "gdlm_release_all_locks" [fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/lock_dlm.ko] undefined! Commit 98ea8e79ff4dfa804690831248881fa6b2145978 ("[GFS2] Remove all_list from lock_dlm") missed one call site of the gdlm_release_all_locks function which it removed. It also neglected to remove the declaration of that function from fs/gfs2/locking/dlm/lock_dlm.h. I have reverted that commit. Sorry, Steven, but I don't see how that could have been build tested ... please take a little more care. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__27_Jun_2008_15_12_25_+1000_6wgWLMJCvBXTE42N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhkdroACgkQTgG2atn1QN9f7QCeIRRYpF78F62D+yzXvKloZF1i gPEAn1GQv8Et9Z7JHGVcxies7ruaGt5g =tG/m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__27_Jun_2008_15_12_25_+1000_6wgWLMJCvBXTE42N--