From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:11:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20080630201116.GA13605@elte.hu> References: <20080701001656.e156585c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48690385.7030500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <48690D3C.1060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080630185943.GA24692@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080630192610.GA6584@elte.hu> <20080630194727.GA26682@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080630200623.GE6584@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:53118 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751553AbYF3UML (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:12:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080630200623.GE6584@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Kamalesh Babulal , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Jens Axboe , Andy Whitcroft , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" * Ingo Molnar wrote: > ah, ok. So the patch below should solve this for now? s/patch below/hack below/. (The real fix has to tur it into a well-documented limit instead of adding yet another hardcoded arbitrary limit that we'll hit in 5 years or so.) Ingo