From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:10:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080701021046.GA30401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48695449.5010602@zytor.com>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:46:49PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Here is a patch to replace the hard-coded limit with dynamic allocation.
> I have only build-tested it, but it seems to work.
>
> Please try it out; barring any screams to the contrary I'll add it to -tip.
>
> -hpa
I think there was no specific reason for limit 100. Just that probably at
that point Eric thought 100 is sufficient. Dynamic allocation is much
better.
This patch looks good. Thanks.
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-01 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-30 14:16 linux-next: Tree for June 30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-30 16:02 ` [BUILD-FAILURE] " Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 16:43 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 18:59 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-30 19:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 19:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-30 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-30 20:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-06-30 20:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 20:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-06-30 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-01 2:10 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2008-07-01 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-01 8:15 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-07-01 9:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 17:59 ` Jens Axboe
2008-06-30 18:21 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 18:25 ` [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30 - powerpc - build failure at arch_add_memory() Kamalesh Babulal
2008-07-01 1:34 ` Tony Breeds
2008-07-01 8:04 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2008-06-30 18:43 ` linux-next: Tree for June 30 (USB: cdc-acm) Randy Dunlap
2008-06-30 19:01 ` Greg KH
2008-06-30 19:32 ` Alan Stern
2008-07-01 12:22 ` Oliver Neukum
2008-07-01 17:10 ` Oliver Neukum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080701021046.GA30401@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).