From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:56:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20080701065614.GA26601@elte.hu> References: <20080701001656.e156585c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48690385.7030500@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <48690D3C.1060803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080630185943.GA24692@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080630192610.GA6584@elte.hu> <20080630194727.GA26682@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080630200623.GE6584@elte.hu> <20080630202506.GA28050@uranus.ravnborg.org> <486943F1.80606@zytor.com> <48695449.5010602@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:52407 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948AbYGAG55 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:57:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48695449.5010602@zytor.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Kamalesh Babulal , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Jens Axboe , Andy Whitcroft , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Vivek Goyal , "Eric W. Biederman" * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Here is a patch to replace the hard-coded limit with dynamic > allocation. > I have only build-tested it, but it seems to work. > > Please try it out; barring any screams to the contrary I'll add it to > -tip. it's looking good here too in my testing. I dont think there's a v2.6.26 urgency as the first time we've ever seen this warning was in linux-next. If it passes testing i agree that it's good for v2.6.27. Ingo