From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:25:56 -0700 Message-ID: <20080701152556.GA3973@kroah.com> References: <20080701215713.8796c966.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:43715 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757507AbYGAPbG (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 11:31:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Alan Cox , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:59:00AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 21:57:13 +1000, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the ttydev tree got a conflict in > > drivers/usb/serial/ir-usb.c between commit > > 3128101cf92692e300fdb8bf66a9e8f286cbaa7f ("usb: irda: cleanup on ir-usb > > module") from the usb tree and commits > > ce8194a09dee5b7e101467aba6b7cd5617b1cd0f ("23-usb-serial-api-change") and > > ad58854921eeeab97a09600260ea03fa097394e4 ("48-tty-tidy-usb-ir-usb") from > > the ttydev tree. > > > > I didn't even know where to start :-(, so I used the version from the > > ttydev tree (since the other is just a cleanup). > > Greg, should i refresh the patch and resend ? No, your patch is fine, the tty tree should be able to handle this. thanks, greg k-h