From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joseph Fannin Subject: Re: inux-next 0701 mv643xx_eth powerpc build failure Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:11:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20080702031111.GA26752@nineveh.local> References: <20080702011434.6fb403d5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.28]:21873 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751185AbYGBDLZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:11:25 -0400 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so91636ywe.1 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080702011434.6fb403d5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Lennert Buytenhek On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 01:14:34AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [next-20080701] I'm getting a build failure on 32bit powerpc in -next, but not in mainline: drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c: In function 'mv643xx_eth_netpoll': drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c:2115: error: 'INT_CAUSE_EXT' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c:2115: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c:2115: error: for each function it appears in.) I haven't investigated any further than a quick check if this hardware even makes sense on 32bit powerpc -- it seems it does. For now, I'm just going to punt this and go to bed. :-) -- Joseph Fannin jfannin@gmail.com