From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:44:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080707.224424.266564848.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080708141004.4a0aef3c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60286 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbYGHFoZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:44:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080708141004.4a0aef3c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, romieu@fr.zoreil.com, jgarzik@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, gorcunov@gmail.com From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:10:04 +1000 > I thought we didn't do defconfig updates for things like this as just > running "make oldconfig" should have the same effect ... These defconfig changes have been removed from the net-next-2.6 tree.