From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Re: linux-next: Tree for June 24 (XFS x2) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:19:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20080716071922.GA16777@lst.de> References: <20080624175612.cdf29651.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080624171809.42bbdf68.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20080625003751.GP29319@disturbed> <20080627132317.GB23854@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:45399 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751061AbYGPHTp (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:19:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080627132317.GB23854@lst.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The tree is still messed up. This original [XFS] commit is still there, > but also a revert of it. but no patch with the actual changes again (?) > > Also my patch to switch to the generic xattr code is attributed to > Lachlan and appears twice in the commit list. I think this whole git > tree needs to be regenerated. Could this please get fixed before the 2.6.27 pull? The xfs.git tree now has Linus' latest changes pulled but this still doesn't look fixed up.