From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the generic-ipi tree Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20080716104012.GA2425@elte.hu> References: <20080716194517.fc260962.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080716101921.GA16688@elte.hu> <20080716202521.ea91d90d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:58103 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751837AbYGPKkk (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:40:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080716202521.ea91d90d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-next@vger.kernel.org * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:19:21 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > hm, generic-ipi is already in Linus's tree: > > Yeah, but powerpc wasn't when I started this morning (and now is). > > > i hope i'll be able to update the auto-*-next branches soon - a lot of > > them got very empty ;-) > > As I am hoping ... hm, so them being stale over the merge window is a problem for you, even thought the sha1's didnt change? Ok - i'll do a full integration run right away to update them all to linus-very-latest. There's been quite a number of nontrivial interactions. Ingo