From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (sysctl/syscall) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:21:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20080717152131.13ada1fc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20080718012842.690b8346.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:20686 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756220AbYGQWXG (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:23:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080718012842.690b8346.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Who is making patches to kernel/sysctl.c ? With CONFIG_SYSCTL=y # CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL is not set linux-next-20080717 produces: linux-next-20080717/kernel/sysctl.c:2970: error: redefinition of 'setup_sysctl_set' linux-next-20080717/kernel/sysctl.c:1963: error: previous definition of 'setup_sysctl_set' was here because one definition of it is bounded by CONFIG_SYSCTL and another definition of it is bounded by CONFIG_SYSCTL_SYSCALL... :( --- ~Randy Linux Plumbers Conference, 17-19 September 2008, Portland, Oregon USA http://linuxplumbersconf.org/