linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: x86 tree build failure
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:12:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080718201206.GA16377@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080718201040.GC27176@elte.hu>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> > The basic problem is that I completely overlooked the fact that some 
> > headers use the guards of _other_ headers in #if-checks. I think we 
> > should drop the consolidations completely until I have fixed the 
> > script to replace the header guard names which are used in other 
> > files as well. I'm sorry :-/
> 
> ok, dropped them from the -next integration rules. Stephen, can you 
> use the previous version of the x86 branch, or should i reintegrate it 
> now?

ok, i fixed it up in tip/auto-x86-next and pushed it out.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-18 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-17  2:07 linux-next: x86 tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-17  9:23 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-18 20:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-18 20:12     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-19 12:11       ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-11 23:56 Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-12  6:05 ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-12  7:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-09-12  7:54     ` Joerg Roedel
2008-09-12  8:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 19:52       ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 10:22 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-25 10:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-17  3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-17  5:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-17  6:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-17  6:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-18  5:04   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-18  6:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-06-25  3:17 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080718201206.GA16377@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).