From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: please hold off 2.6.28 stuff Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:29:39 -0700 Message-ID: <20080720232939.ec6dc79e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080721135108.d4ca4be5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1216620821.13328.14.camel@brick> <20080721162141.22ea4331.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45652 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754969AbYGUG3r (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:29:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080721162141.22ea4331.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Harvey Harrison , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:21:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Harvey, > > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:13:41 -0700 Harvey Harrison wrote: > > > > I would say let -rc2 be the flag for putting things for the next (2.6.28) release > > into -next. That would give akpm time to get his load in as well. > > Between -rc1 and -rc2, he could look at -next to see what patches were > > picked up by maintainers and what he'll still have to send in himself. > > Fine by me - I get another week off :-) We can't have that. > Andrew? -rc1 is a suitable time, thanks.