From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Thumb-2 kernel support
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:53:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080728125336.GL32366@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217248855.20282.124.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 01:40:55PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:45 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 12:08 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:10:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Well. Rather than doing things sequentially we could go parallel.
> > > > Russell could say "I'll look at them before 2.6.28 but please put them
> > > > into linux-next meanwhile".
> > >
> > > There have been some valid but (iirc) non-vocal objections to the
> > > Thumb-2 support from a few people. The biggest one is all the
> > > mess associated with supporting this "unified" assembler stuff.
> >
> > My first implementation of these patches (last year) created a separate
> > arch/ directory and a lot of people objected to this recommending to
> > merge it into the existing arch/arm. Once I posted the re-worked
> > implementation there were no big .
>
> It looks like I didn't finish the above phrase - I meant no big
> objections to the conditional compilation or someone stating clearly
> that this is unacceptable.
And that's partly what I find rather frustrating. I _know_ that people
have issues with it, but they haven't raised them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-28 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080606173300.7930.31525.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
2008-06-30 19:51 ` [PATCH 00/12] Thumb-2 kernel support Andrew Morton
2008-07-01 8:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-01 8:45 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-23 16:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-23 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-23 21:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-23 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-24 8:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-27 11:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-07-28 11:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-28 12:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-07-28 12:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2008-08-12 2:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-07-28 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2008-07-28 14:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2008-08-12 2:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080728125336.GL32366@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).