From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for September 5 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:57:56 +0200 Message-ID: <200809100257.56108.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20080905190941.0f86ebac.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <48C51CF8.2030208@suse.de> <48C6F031.1050300@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f16.google.com ([209.85.217.16]:35729 "EHLO mail-gx0-f16.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751478AbYIJBCd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:02:33 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so12381129gxk.13 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:02:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48C6F031.1050300@suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexey Starikovskiy Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > Hi Bartolmiej, > > This patch is really important for many people, and your report > blocks it from being used. Interesting, "bad" bugreport blocks "good" patch from being used? While the patch may be really important for some people it broke things here in the major way and you sent me the updated patch only _yesterday_. > It would be very great if you could test the updated patch. Anyway this one works fine (at least with Linus' tree since it won't apply to linux-next). > Thanks in advance, > Alex. > > Alexey Starikovskiy wrote: > > Hi Bartlomiej, > > > > Could you please try updated patch? > > > > Thanks, > > Alex.