From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: linux-next: x86 tree build failure Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:54:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20080912075425.GA22582@amd.com> References: <20080912095618.728658a5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080912060527.GA22003@amd.com> <20080912173141.5b268bed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from outbound-sin.frontbridge.com ([207.46.51.80]:53972 "EHLO SG2EHSOBE004.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752163AbYILHyl (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:54:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080912173141.5b268bed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:31:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:05:27 +0200 Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > do you have these commits in next/master already? I tried to find out > > Not until tomorrow some time, sorry. > > > why it fails (the build failure is weird because > > PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_MISC and PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_11H_NB_MISC > > are defined in the same place in tip/master). > > tip/master has more trees merged than the x86 tree (and indeed > PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_10H_NB_MISC turns up in the timers tree). Ah ok, there is the problem, I see. Thanks. Joerg -- | AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896 Research | General Partner authorized to represent: Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US) | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy