From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hid tree Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:54:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20081014135407.GA11470@suse.de> References: <20081014175143.731c8280.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54546 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751028AbYJNN50 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:57:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Today's linux-next merge of the hid tree got a conflict in > > drivers/hid/hid-tmff.c between commits > > 454db62d208add27f30fcbcc00435768245407c9 ("USB: remove warn() macro from > > usb hid drivers") and 3e85ea87fdfbb9440dacda77b4de30472e0d38c9 ("USB: > > remove info() macro from usb HID drivers") from the usb tree > > Thanks Stephen for letting us know. These two patches should actually be > dropped from USB tree completely, I believe, as I have taken them through > my tree. Greg? Yes, you are correct, I did not get the time to update my public tree in the past few days due to other work :( Should get to it today. thanks, greg k-h