From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:41:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081017164116.GA17375@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4423d670810170543vd6b4c39p44bf125610d8540@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:43:07PM +0400, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> It is SMP x86_64, rootfs is on XFS
The message comes from code in XFS, but I really wonder where the atomic
context comes from. xfs_iget_core has a few changes in the tree pulled
into todays Linux-next, but it's still missing the recent updates
redoing this area completely. In some ways it looks like this process
has the the atomic context flag left pending somewhere, but that should
also trigger warnings on the VFS locks like i_mutex.
Very misterious.
IS there a specific workload you can reproduce this with?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-17 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 12:43 BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-17 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-10-17 16:54 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-17 16:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-17 17:13 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-17 20:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-17 20:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-20 14:58 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-20 16:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-20 17:13 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-20 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-21 11:42 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-22 7:58 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-22 8:21 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-22 8:28 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-22 8:25 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-22 9:12 ` Alexander Beregalov
2008-10-22 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-22 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-22 15:06 ` BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081017164116.GA17375@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).