From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:16:11 +1100
Message-ID: <200810231616.12076.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <20081023151241.d5ad0919.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:52281 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751873AbYJWFQJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:16:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20081023151241.d5ad0919.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

On Thursday 23 October 2008 15:12:41 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rr tree got a conflict in kernel/smp.c
> between commit 562d8c23497402eb7eb9caf8dab84439a03a49ea ("smp: reduce
> stack requirements for smp_call_function_mask") from the cpus4096 tree
> and commit  ("1855648ee0b5ed8fe800edf401bbe25a3f2ed94a") from the rr tree.
>
> Overlapping changes.  I have used the version from the rr tree, but I am
> not sure if that is the correct thing to do.

Mike?

Rusty.