From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:19:57 +0200 Message-ID: <200810251519.57543.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20081024171932.1e8131d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <49024EA3.1080404@ru.mvista.com> <1224889818.7654.466.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.188]:61585 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751403AbYJYNWI (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:22:08 -0400 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e6so174591gvc.37 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:22:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1224889818.7654.466.camel@pasglop> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , Kamalesh Babulal , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 25 October 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 02:39 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > >> Hm, looks like this configuration was never buildable -- > > #ifdef's are > > >> missing and wrongly placed. CCing Ben Herrenschmidt... > > >> > > > > > > What configuration ? > > > > > > > See the subject. > > Ah ok. We should probably just remove the option... Fine with me. Anybody want an easy +1 patch-point? :)