From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 24 - powerpc - build failure with !CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PMAC Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:35:15 +0200 Message-ID: <200810252135.16056.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20081024171932.1e8131d0.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200810251519.57543.bzolnier@gmail.com> <49036C17.1060604@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.191]:38788 "EHLO mu-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942AbYJYTg4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:36:56 -0400 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1086384muf.1 for ; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:36:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49036C17.1060604@ru.mvista.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, Kamalesh Babulal , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 25 October 2008, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > >>>>> Hm, looks like this configuration was never buildable -- #ifdef's are missing and wrongly placed. CCing Ben Herrenschmidt... > >>>>> > >>>> What configuration ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>> See the subject. > >>> > >> Ah ok. We should probably just remove the option... > >> > > > > Fine with me. Anybody want an easy +1 patch-point? :) > > > > BTW, why this option selects BLK_DEV_IDEDMA_PCI? Leftover from the dark-ages... needs fixing.