From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:19:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081103151911.b18d641a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the slab tree got a conflict in mm/vmscan.c
between commit 4f98a2fee8acdb4ac84545df98cccecfd130f8db ("vmscan: split
LRU lists into anon & file sets") from Linus' tree and commit
9fb8a023ad432b0ca884790a8a05991180ab42b6 ("slub: Trigger defragmentation
from memory reclaim") from the slab tree.
Overlapping changes. I fixed it up (see below) and will carry the fix
for a few days (during which time I hope it will be fixed in the slab
tree).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
diff --cc mm/vmscan.c
index 3b58602,b72cb36..0000000
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@@ -2095,7 -1932,7 +2144,7 @@@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigne
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
shrink_slab(sc.nr_scanned, sc.gfp_mask,
- global_lru_pages());
- count_lru_pages(), NULL);
++ global_lru_pages(), NULL);
ret += reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab;
if (ret >= nr_pages)
goto out;
@@@ -2112,7 -1949,7 +2161,7 @@@
if (!ret) {
do {
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
- shrink_slab(nr_pages, sc.gfp_mask, global_lru_pages());
- shrink_slab(nr_pages, sc.gfp_mask, count_lru_pages(), NULL);
++ shrink_slab(nr_pages, sc.gfp_mask, global_lru_pages(), NULL);
ret += reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab;
} while (ret < nr_pages && reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab > 0);
}
next reply other threads:[~2008-11-03 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-03 4:19 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2008-11-03 4:52 ` linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-11-03 9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-03 4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03 9:39 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-11-03 4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-03 9:38 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-21 4:55 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 6:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 7:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 7:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 7:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-08-13 7:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-13 7:40 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081103151911.b18d641a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox