From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 7 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 20:13:03 +0100 Message-ID: <200811082013.04066.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20081107205457.f64dea59.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200811081257.45184.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20081108184315.GA9382@x200.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:53679 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750921AbYKHTS5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:18:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081108184315.GA9382@x200.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "Eric W. Biederman" , "David S. Miller" On Saturday 08 November 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:57:44PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Friday 07 November 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Changes since 20081106: > > > > The following patch fixes the panic on loopback device registration > > (patch is an interdiff between old and new version of "net: Guaranetee > > the proper ordering of the loopback device." fix from Eric). > > > > [ I'm sure this will get fixed in -net tree (if not fixed already) > > but at the moment it is needed for linux-next. ] > > This patch alone is a) not enough, and b) davem already pushed out correct > version. Well, it was enough to make next-20081107 bootable for me. :-) However, it seems like the following patch is also neeed by linux-next users: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=5d6d480908300a0c0b3be8b58567dfcef62c83a5 [ I also see that it is fixed now but it was actually an overdue mail from yesterday and like I said earlier, the sole its purpose was to help people trying linux-next kernels (linux-next is not released on weekends so from their POV it doesn't really matter if it already got fixed in net-next). ] Thanks, Bart