From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: linux-m68k.git Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:13:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20081119081359.GB794@linux-mips.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from h4.dl5rb.org.uk ([81.2.74.4]:46462 "EHLO ditditdahdahdah-dahdahdahditdit.dl5rb.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751308AbYKSIOZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:14:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux/m68k , David Woodhouse , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Development , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:49:01PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > (Finally) I created an experimental git tree for Linux/m68k: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git > > It contains more or less all patches I had in my quilt series at > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/geert/linux-m68k-patches-2.6/ > A notable exception is m68k-PRIVATE-m68k-changes.diff, which hardcoded ARCH to > m68k. > > As suggested by David Woodhouse, I grouped the commits by topic. But unlike > David's suggestion, I used topic branches, not topic repositories. Oh well, > we'll see... That's easy enough to undo if the need should arise. > I also created for-next and for-linus branches. Do they look OK? > > If I did something wrong, please let me know. > This is still experimental stuff, which may be rebased if needed. > > In addition, one day I may pull from Ralf's repository that reflects the state > of Linux/m68k CVS a few commits before our server died... It's CVS that must die, not the poor server ;-) If you're actually going to pull the old CVS stuff into the new git repository and you happen to have a newer snapshot than the one which I've converted I can re-run my converter. Ralf