From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: linux-next: concerns over the perfmon3 tree Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:47:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20081126104726.GA8580@elte.hu> References: <20081126213449.ab269449.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:36691 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751364AbYKZKrt (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:47:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081126213449.ab269449.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: stephane eranian , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Stephane, > > Given the concerns expressed by Ingo, I have dropped the perfmon3 > tree from linux-next until they have been addressed. Hopefully that > will not be loo long. Let us all know how we can help with this. Thanks, we'll try to finish the review ASAP (today+tomorrow) so that it can be added back in 1-2 days. And it's sensible to keep it in the separate perfmon3 tree as well (as long as it's not rebased) - that's a convenient initial structure for new features. ( and the powerpc bits would be nice as well, they seem to be missing from the current lineup - the more architectures keep hitting on that code, the better the end result. ) Ingo