From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: linux-next: concerns over the perfmon3 tree
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:34:49 +1100
Message-ID: <20081126213449.ab269449.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 micalg="PGP-SHA1";
 boundary="Signature=_Wed__26_Nov_2008_21_34_49_+1100_7Rth/3ziyuxlgXAF"
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:54368 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750797AbYKZKfG (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 26 Nov 2008 05:35:06 -0500
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>

--Signature=_Wed__26_Nov_2008_21_34_49_+1100_7Rth/3ziyuxlgXAF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Stephane,

Given the concerns expressed by Ingo, I have dropped the perfmon3 tree
from linux-next until they have been addressed.  Hopefully that will not
be loo long.  Let us all know how we can help with this.

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

--Signature=_Wed__26_Nov_2008_21_34_49_+1100_7Rth/3ziyuxlgXAF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkktJkkACgkQjjKRsyhoI8w47gCgoVB/BkoJ9kDRPBBPChzRktxs
VVIAnAgNwCS3AbtNE7bzca8yYyizwSzm
=3nYe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature=_Wed__26_Nov_2008_21_34_49_+1100_7Rth/3ziyuxlgXAF--