From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: next-2008-11-28: bfin vs cpumask fixlet Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:17:57 +1030 Message-ID: <200812011517.57601.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20081128213620.2ec593d4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081128151755.GA27660@x200.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:34056 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751565AbYLAEsD (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:48:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081128151755.GA27660@x200.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 29 November 2008 01:47:55 Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c > +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c > @@ -162,7 +162,6 @@ static struct clock_event_device clockevent_bfin = { > .name = "bfin_core_timer", > .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT, > .shift = 32, > - .cpumask = CPU_MASK_CPU0, Thanks Alexey, applied. I grepped harder, and this seems to be the last one. Cheers, Rusty.