From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: sparc tree build failure Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:04:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20081203.160423.173238095.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20081202172413.f14fe387.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200812022152.25989.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38884 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757864AbYLDAEX (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Dec 2008 19:04:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200812022152.25989.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org From: Rusty Russell Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:52:25 +1030 > On Tuesday 02 December 2008 16:54:13 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Today's linux-next build (sparc defconfig) failed like this: > > > > lib/find_next_bit.c: In function 'find_last_bit': > > lib/find_next_bit.c:183: error: implicit declaration of function '__fls' > > Thanks Stephen... that's a surprise. > > Dave, I think this is a sparc issue. > > sparc: asm/bitops.h should define __fls I'll add this patch, thanks Rusty.