From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS breakage on m68k (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:50:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20081204125006.GA13411@infradead.org> References: <20081203183602.c06f8c39.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081204121330.GA18815@infradead.org> <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:35931 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752117AbYLDMuO (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2008 07:50:14 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081204234603.b5a28cd6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Geert Uytterhoeven , Eric Sandeen , Christoph Hellwig , Lachlan McIlroy , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:46:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c:365: error: 'xfs_file_compat_invis_ioctl' undeclared here (not in a function) > > Eric mentioned that your patch "had a problem of its own", so I assumed > that was it and left it removed from today's linux-next. Yeah, but Niv fixed it up and the correct version is not in the xfs git tree.