From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: next-2008-11-09: s390 vs ->ioctx_list Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:13:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20081209071305.GO23742@kernel.dk> References: <20081208205929.366a9a01.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081209001113.GA6107@x200.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:6383 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751950AbYLIHNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 02:13:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081209001113.GA6107@x200.localdomain> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmoyer@redhat.com On Tue, Dec 09 2008, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > CC arch/s390/mm/pgtable.o > arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c: In function 's390_enable_sie': > arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c:266: error: invalid operands to binary || > arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c:282: error: invalid operands to binary || > > This is because ->ioctx_list turned from pointer to a hlist, some more locking > and different check required. Already posted a patch for this on friday, the branches have now been updated. -- Jens Axboe