From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:52:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20081210145226.8a174e68.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20081210164659.9ebb8158.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56319 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752501AbYLJWxV (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:53:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081210164659.9ebb8158.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:46:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I have created today's linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git > (patches at > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/) This tree breaks poweroff on my x86_64 test box. `halt -pfn' does all the usual things, but the machine doesn't turn off. config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-akpm2.txt dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-akpm2.txt Any suggestions which don't include the word "bisect" would be most welcome.