From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:42:49 +0900 Message-ID: <20081211074248.GA11314@linux-sh.org> References: <20081211182530.924d4af6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mta23.gyao.ne.jp ([125.63.38.249]:13008 "EHLO mx.gate01.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811AbYLKHos (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:44:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081211182530.924d4af6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: David Howells , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 06:25:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi David, > > Today's linux-next merge of the nommu tree got a conflict in > Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt between commit > cb8fc7a88a0069ebdab220180bf9b45e568f0ba9 ("slub: Trigger defragmentation > from memory reclaim") from the slab tree and commit > 1a5d96d0151ce2ec77bf08498751fe8d9365c95f ("NOMMU: Make mmap allocation > page trimming behaviour configurable.") from the nommu tree. > > Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the > fix as necessary. I suppose this is what happens when everyone has the same bright idea of appending to the end of the file. Though I am surprised that there was contention in Documentation/ of all places. Thanks for fixing this up.