From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask:cpumask_of_node-ia64 fix
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:41:24 +1030
Message-ID: <200812121841.25429.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <20081211105721.4FEE.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <494093F7.5020000@sgi.com> <20081211132146.4FFD.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:54494 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750703AbYLLILe (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:11:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20081211132146.4FFD.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thursday 11 December 2008 15:23:09 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> and my review and test doen't find any problem in your patch.
> Very thanks.
...
> The following is the folded patch of your patch and your over-simplified fix.

Thanks for this.  I do not know how I missed these (I did not have an IA64
cross-compiler then though).

I will fold this fix into the ia64 cpumask_of_node patch.

Thanks,
Rusty.