linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:33:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812161133.48529.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081216191419.43ae28af.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tuesday 16 December 2008 3:14:19 am Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> security/smack/smackfs.c: In function 'smk_netlabel_audit_set':
> security/smack/smackfs.c:118: error: 'struct task_struct' has no
> member named 'security'
>
> Caused by commit 2d22b59c5401e60c04e6258a245b8a99d103f55b ("smack:
> Add support for unlabeled network hosts and networks") interacting
> with commit b6dff3ec5e116e3af6f537d4caedcad6b9e5082a ("CRED: Separate
> task security context from task_struct") from the security-testing
> tree.  This latter commit is also in the lblnet tree (since it merges
> the security testing tree).
>
> I have dropped the lblnet tree for today.

My mistake, it should be fixed now.

When I was updating the lblnet-2.6_next tree yesterday I made a mistake 
and didn't refresh Casey's patch completely when merging it against the 
security-testing tree as a result some of the necessary merges didn't 
make it out of my local directory.  Sorry guys.

-- 
paul moore
linux @ hp

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-16 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-16  8:14 linux-next: lblnet tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 16:33 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2008-12-17  0:04   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-03  5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-03 14:51 ` Paul Moore
2008-12-04  0:04   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-18  4:11 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-18 14:26 ` Paul Moore
2008-11-18 20:08   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200812161133.48529.paul.moore@hp.com \
    --to=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).