From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:25:57 -0800
Message-ID: <20081218092557.b274e9dd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References: <20081218230637.c879a046.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:47103 "EHLO
	acsinet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750753AbYLRR0Q (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:26:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20081218230637.c879a046.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:06:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20081217:
> 
> New tree:
> 	fscache


When CONFIG_BLOCK=n:

build-r7417.out:/local/linsrc/linux-next-20081218/fs/cachefiles/cf-interface.c:357: error: implicit declaration of function 'fsync_super'
build-r7417.out:make[3]: *** [fs/cachefiles/cf-interface.o] Error 1


Should include/linux/buffer_head.h have an empty stub for fsync_super()
or does fscache even make sense when CONFIG_BLOCK=n?

---
~Randy