From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:44:00 +1030 Message-ID: <200812181644.00796.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <200812011646.35018.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <4949831B.2000809@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:58511 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752144AbYLRGOF (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:14:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4949831B.2000809@sgi.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mike Travis Cc: Ingo Molnar , Stephen Rothwell , LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:24:19 Mike Travis wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer. > > > > (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just > > airing it here for thoroughness). > > > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell > > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis > > Cc: Ingo Molnar > > I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree. > > [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86 > > I can also line up a queue for sched related changes: > > [PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map() > > Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390? (I assume > that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?) > > [PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc > [PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390 You can't take 4/4 until 2/4 and 3/4 are merged, and since it's not x86-specific as well, we'll leave it in my tree. Thanks, Rusty.