From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:39:38 +1100 Message-ID: <20081219103938.GD17177@disturbed> References: <20081218230637.c879a046.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081218161437.fe2d2675.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.145]:32284 "EHLO ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752567AbYLSKjp (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:39:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081218161437.fe2d2675.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , akpm On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 04:14:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > fs/inode.c and mm/filemap.c need kernel-doc fixes. > > What tree were these merged into for linux-next? The fs/inode.c one ended up going through the XFS tree because of the XFs code dependent on it.... > How do I get these doc fixes merged? (2 patches below) Perhaps best to go through the VFS tree for fs/inode.c changes. > --- > > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix fs/inode.c kernel-doc function parameters: > > Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:120): No description found for parameter 'sb' > Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:120): No description found for parameter 'inode' > Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:588): No description found for parameter 'sb' > Warning(linux-next-20081218//fs/inode.c:588): No description found for parameter 'inode' > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > cc: Dave Chinner Looks fine to me. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com