From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:17:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20081223171726.GB4043@kroah.com> References: <20081222113335.667c2d01.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200812220926.43784.inaky@linux.intel.com> <20081223043139.GG1928@kroah.com> <200812230226.29519.inaky@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:49232 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183AbYLWRU1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:20:27 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812230226.29519.inaky@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 02:26:28AM -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > On Monday 22 December 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:26:43AM -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > > > On Sunday 21 December 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > ops -- ok, I will. I guess I have to add this in all the similar ones, > > > right? > > > > > > Greg, do you want a new patch series or just another patch on top? > > > > Just a single replacement patch for when we add this makefile is fine > > with me. > > Hmmm, there was more feedback Sam gave me on Kconfig and Makefiles I added, > so at the end the patch touches more files than just this one. Maybe a whole > new series will be the way to go. Ick, I really don't want that. But feel free to respin them yourself, and then just send the different patches? It's easy to just replace a few individual ones than to drop the whole series and redo it (well on my end at least...) Heck, tell me what to edit and I can edit individual patches quite easily as well, I'd rather do that as well :) thanks, greg k-h